Friday, April 12, 2019

Startup jobs of the week: 500px, IMRSV Data Labs Inc., Axon VCT - BetaKit

Startup jobs of the week: 500px, IMRSV Data Labs Inc., Axon VCT - BetaKit


Startup jobs of the week: 500px, IMRSV Data Labs Inc., Axon VCT - BetaKit

Posted: 12 Apr 2019 12:40 PM PDT

Every day, Canada's tech startups post their latest and greatest job opportunities on Jobs.BetaKit, powered by Jobbio. From early-stage to Series B and beyond, Jobs.BetaKit helps startups from all over the country hire Canada's top tech talent.

Each week, BetaKit will highlight a selection of the job roles posted to Jobs.BetaKit. If you're a candidate looking for a position at a tech Canadian startup, survey the selection below or view all the posted positions here. For companies in need of top candidates, scroll to the bottom of this post to learn how to get your roles posted to Jobs.BetaKit!


Jobs of the Week (April 12, 2019):

Toronto

Axon VCT – Company Administrator

The company is seeking an enthusiastic and talented company administrator to accelerate their growth. The successful candidate will love learning and thrive in a startup environment where succeeding with diverse challenges and constant change is part of the day to day work.

Statflo – UI/UX Designer

The Product Team at Statflo is looking for a Senior UX/UI Designer who is obsessed with delivering the most delightful user experiences to any platform he/she works on. In this role, you are deeply integrated with the full product development life cycle working closely with Product Owners, design-oriented engineers, as well as other teams.

Smart Nora – Senior Software Engineer / Mobile Developer

Smart Nora is a Toronto based growth phase company that has improved sleep and relationships for tens of thousands of couples around the world. They are looking for a Senior Software Engineer / Mobile Developer to join their team in Toronto in a full-time, salaried, in-house role.

500px – Design Lead

The 500px team is looking for an exceptionally talented, hands-on Design Lead. They're looking for someone who is adept at combining beautiful design with thoughtful product decisions. As a growth stage company, they are looking for someone who is comfortable moving fast and performing in a multidisciplinary setting.


Ottawa

IMRSV Data Labs Inc. – Back-end Software Engineer

The company is looking for a candidate with strong technical skills and engineering drive to help their team deploy world class machine learning solutions for their customers. You will design and implement demos, and convert custom ML/NLP solutions from the research team into production. You will also be critical to getting their research team's ideas to market.


Hire Canada's top tech talent

BetaKit and Jobbio have joined forces to create a digital careers marketplace targeting BetaKit's 1.8 million annual visitors.

For tech companies, that means access to an incredible audience of engaged passive and active candidates. Powered by Jobbio's innovative technology, your jobs are delivered directly to a targeted audience of Canadian tech professionals.

Follow this link to post your job on Jobs.BetaKit today.

Lyft, Uber, and the Changing Disclosure Rules For Unicorn IPOs - Xconomy

Posted: 12 Apr 2019 11:54 AM PDT

Xconomy San Francisco — 

When a much-watched tech company such as Lyft, Uber, or Pinterest files for an initial public stock offering, people eagerly scour the sudden trove of information that such a private business must finally disclose when it begins to offer shares to the general public, rather than only to sophisticated inside investors such as venture capital firms.

For newly public company Lyft, (NASDAQ: LYFT) though, the IPO disclosure requirements were significantly lower than they would usually be for businesses with multiple billions of dollars in annual revenue—and lower than they are for Lyft's big rival Uber, which is now gearing up for its own initial public offering.

Although Lyft was a "unicorn" reportedly valued at $15.1 billion by its VC backers last summer, the company was able to qualify for a series of exemptions to the US Securities and Exchange Commission's financial reporting rules—breaks originally advocated in Congress as a way to make it easier for smaller, "emerging" companies to access the public markets for capital.

The San Francisco-based ride-hailing app company, second only to Uber in the US market, slipped in under the wire when it claimed standing as an "emerging growth company," or EGC, as it filed with the SEC in early December in preparation for the IPO it completed late last month. Because of that EGC status, Lyft wasn't required to disclose as much about its financial results, for example, or about the pay packages for some of its top executives. (More details soon on how Lyft qualified as an EGC.)

The EGC status stems from Title I of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, or JOBS Act, enacted in 2012 with a number of provisions to support the growth of young companies whose easier access to capital would, it was hoped, allow them to hire more workers. The bill's intent was to lower the cost burden for many IPO hopefuls by granting them temporary exemptions to certain accounting standards and other rules.

Some finance experts question whether the bill is achieving its intended effect, and whether its expected benefits outweigh potentially negative consequences for Main Street investors and even the IPO hopefuls themselves. While that debate continues, the SEC is moving to further loosen financial disclosure requirements for IPO candidates. That includes tech companies valued at over $1 billion, which have raised billions of dollars from venture capital firms before going public, and may be better able than other startup companies to afford the extra expense of paying auditors and accountants to prepare more detailed reports to inform investors.

Disclosure exemptions—the pros and cons

Although the JOBS Act passed with bipartisan support in Congress, it wasn't without critics, who worried that important safeguards for investors would be eroded as companies offered their shares on public exchanges after providing thinner-than-usual details on their finances and operations. Some wags dubbed the law the "Jumpstart Our Bilking of Suckers Act," commentator Floyd Norris noted in the New York Times in 2012.

Opponents of the JOBS Act include the Consumer Federation of America, an umbrella organization of nonprofit groups, which advocates for the interests of ordinary investors such as mutual fund shareholders.

Among the other skeptics is Daniel Taylor, an associate professor of accounting at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. Taylor says allowing IPO candidates to withhold information from the investor community could foster a public market for weaker companies, just as used car dealers who hide mechanical flaws can continue to move "lemons" off their lots. Taylor says he's drawing on the insights of Nobel Prize-winning economist George Akerlof, who argued in a seminal 1970 paper, "The Market for Lemons," that measures to remove the information gap between sellers and buyers could collapse the market for dud cars and many other low-value products.

Unsophisticated Main Street investors might lose money even if they don't buy shares in individual EGCs, Taylor says, because newly public companies can be folded into indexes and may become part of their mutual fund portfolios or individual retirement accounts (IRAs). Their investment gains could be affected if the overall quality of public companies declines, he says. And there is research suggesting that looser financial reporting requirements don't actually save companies money, and can end up dinging their stock market performance, he adds.

The SEC, however, has committed to extending disclosure exemptions and other benefits of the JOBS Act to firms much larger than the typical emerging growth company. In fact, these breaks have already spread well into unicorn territory. Uber, which may reach a market capitalization of as much as $100 billion through its IPO, has made use of one of those newer breaks—though it still enjoys significantly fewer advantages than Lyft. This new break is the reason why we haven't been able to see Uber's disclosures to the SEC until this week, even though it filed for an IPO in December.

More exemptions are proposed. In a series of speeches and interviews in August, SEC Chair Jay Clayton said the agency's regulations could be modernized and streamlined without putting investors' interests at risk. In fact, Clayton said, the rule changes would also open up opportunities for Main Street investors to secure stakes in emerging companies that have increasingly delayed going public and relied on private fundraising instead. The SEC is updating or eliminating "requirements that are outdated, overlapping, or duplicative of other Commission rules" or generally accepted accounting principles, he said during a speech in Nashville.

The circumstances under which Lyft qualified as an EGC may rarely be repeated. But that element of its IPO story makes it part of a wider pattern. Other unicorns such as Pinterest and Zoom Video Communications—whose pending IPOs may make them each worth multiple billions of dollars—qualified easily for emerging growth company standing because their annual revenues for the past full year each fell below a JOBS Act cap. Like Lyft, many tech unicorns have already raised billions of dollars from venture capital firms, which peg their private valuations in the billions because of their growth potential. For many, though, their revenue isn't large enough yet to deliver a profit.

How Lyft qualified as an emerging growth company

Under the JOBS Act when it was passed, a private company wishing to qualify as an EGC could have no more than $1 billion in revenue for its most recent full financial year. Lyft, which priced its IPO on March 28, reported revenue more than double that for its full prior year of 2018—over $2.1 billion.

But because Lyft first filed for its IPO in December, before 2018 came to an end, it could apparently rely instead on the revenue for its most recent full year— 2017—when it gained EGC standing. (Lyft, which is in a post-IPO quiet period, declined to comment on the filing.) The company's revenue for 2017 was $1.059 billion—still more than the original $1 billion limit. However, the JOBS Act had also called for that cap to be adjusted every five years for inflation, and in 2017 the ceiling was raised to $1.07 billion. Lyft could squeak in by a margin of about $10.1 million.

However, people might wonder, wouldn't Lyft's standing as an EGC expire at the close of 2018, because its revenue of more than $2.1 billion for that year blew past the JOBS Act cap? The answer is no, because of … Next Page »

Single PageCurrently on Page: 1 2 3

Bernadette Tansey is Xconomy's San Francisco Editor. You can reach her at btansey@xconomy.com. Follow @Tansey_Xconomy

Trending on Xconomy

#OpenBanking: Meet the Fintech Startup that Claims to be India's First Neo-Bank - Entrepreneur

Posted: 12 Apr 2019 02:28 AM PDT

Anish Achuthan, during his previous stint, discovered that traditional banks are not ready to solve new-age problems as their infrastructure is built on legacy systems

4 min read

You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media.

In today's age of digitisation, it is all about the customer and improving his/her experience. To achieve this goal, banks and fintech companies have started looking at innovation as a team. This change in the ecosystem has invented the concept of neo banking which can be rightly dubbed as the new era of the banking industry.

Anish Achuthan has been an entrepreneur most of his life. Before starting one of India's first neo-banking platform Open, he co-founded three fintech startups, of which two were acquired.

But during his previous stint, he dealt with a lot of small businesses and realised banking is pain area for these companies. SMEs often struggle with cash flow management while they use multiple interfaces for services like a payment gateway, separate invoicing software, accounting tools as against an integrated platform.

He also discovered that traditional banks are not ready to solve this problem as their infrastructure is built on legacy systems. Additionally, they often fail to cater to the requirements of new-age businesses and continue to monetise their larger clients.

Achuthan saw this opportunity to start a digital bank focusing on the SMEs. However, considering getting a banking license in India for a startup is next to impossible, the serial entrepreneur started studying neo-banks operating in Europe and the US.

"There are more than 16 neo banking companies globally and most of them are doing really well. In other words, banks are open to partner with neo banks and clients are open to adopting a digital bank.  So we felt like, there is a good opportunity to bring this model to the Indian market as domestic SMEs are adopting online services more than ever," he said to Entrepreneur India.

The Neo-Outlook to Open Banking

After a year of piloting, the neo-bank launched its services partnering with ICICI Bank and presently has almost 11 banks as partners. Open has also crossed around USD 4 billion of analyzed transactions revenues on the platform.

He adds, "Most of the banks now realize that open banking is the next big thing. They understand that banks should remain as a platform and other fintech companies should build the experience. Even PSUs like SBI and Bank of Baroda have actually created their own open banking platform and are putting up great teams to talk about it."  

With bankers now discussing to open their APIs for fintech startups to build solutions around it, Achuthan opines that there is a lot of opportunities for businesses to innovate with open banking,

"Neo- banking is not just about financial inclusion, it's also about bundling banking services with other financial services.  So in India, neo banking can work as an extension to solve for the financial inclusion challenges. Secondly, we are seeing fintech start-ups build niche solutions focusing on blue collar jobs and that's the way forward," he added.

The Bottle Necks

Considering RBI and government agenda to digitalise banking service, one would believe starting a neo banking startup is an easy job. But the case is otherwise.

Achuthan says getting a banking partner is difficult. "You may have heard the banks are open to fintech partnership but in reality along with multiple departments in the bank and each of this could take up to 12 to 15 months. And if at all they partner, they may or may not have the technical capabilities to adopt your solutions," he pointed out.

Furthermore, the founder explains that getting access to the right information is one of the biggest challenges because regulation around the subject is still in the grey areas and there are multiple interpretations to it.

"However, unlike cryptocurrency, the RBI is very much committed to helping banks and fintech working together and hence, with time there would clarity around multiple banking regulations," he noted.  

With open banking already disrupting the global banking ecosystem, it is only a matter of time and the Indian ecosystem would say hello to new banks..oops we mean neo banks!

No comments:

Post a Comment